|
I also ran 3DMark 2000 on CrossOver Office to see what kind of score I would get. I can try and bench everything here in full screen mode and on CrossOver if people are interested in this type of data.(just let me know) Also if you by chance have a system with similar hardware as this box and have XP installed on it, and any of the benchmarks below please send me the data and ill post the results so other readers can see the difference in the scores. I will most likely at a future date break down and purchase a XP Pro licence just for the sole purpose of comparing the two systems. Wine version: 0.9.49 Distro: Gentoo current system specs: ASUS P5N-E SLI Motherboard Intel 4-core CPU @ 2.4Ghz 8GB Dual-channel DDR2 800Mhz Memory Black Steel Modular case w/extra fans 450w PSU PCIe x4 hardware raid SATA II (4) 320GB SATA 3.0G drives (PRT) Nvidia 8800GTS-640MB PCIe x16 video 22" high-speed widescreen LCD Plextor DVD+-RW/CDRW Linux Kernel 2.6.22 compile time: 1 minute 13 seconds Wine 0.9.49 configure, compile, unmerge, emerge time: 5 minutes 30 seconds 3DMark 2000 ver 1.1 1024x768x16   3DMark 2000 ver 1.1 1024x768x32   3DMark 2001SE 1024x768x32    3DMark 2001SE full screen 1024x768x32   3DMark 2003 1024x768x32     GL Excess 1.2v 1024x768x32  PassMark Performance Test 6.1   AquaMark 3 1024x768x32    The score is higher in CrossOver because image quality is slightly inferior to Wine, for example Environmental Bump Mapping in Wine works where as it doesn't in CrossOver. CrossOver Office 3DMark 2000 1024x768x16   CrossOver Office 3DMark 2000 1024x768x32   3DMark 05/06 and PC Mark 2004 will be run at a later date. 
|
